Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0191120190340120101
Journal of Korean Medical Science
2019 Volume.34 No. 12 p.101 ~ p.101
Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
Jung Yoon-Suk

Kim Nam-Hee
Park Jung-Ho
Park Dong-Il
Sohn Chong-Il
Abstract
Background: Current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines are based on studies in patients aged ¡Ã50 years. Equal application of the guidelines in patients aged < 50 years may be unreasonable. We aimed to determine an appropriate surveillance interval after adenoma removal in patients aged < 50 years.

Methods: We studied 10,013 patients who underwent ¡Ã 1 adenoma removal and follow-up colonoscopy. The cumulative risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) was compared among the eight groups based on age (30?39, 40?44, 45?49 and ¡Ã 50 years) and baseline adenoma characteristics (low- [LRA] and high-risk adenoma [HRA]).

Results: The risk of metachronous ACRN in patients aged 30?39 and 40?44 years with HRA was comparable to that in those aged ¡Ã 50 years with LRA (P = 0.839 and P = 0.381, respectively). However, the risk in those aged 45?49 years with HRA was higher than in those aged ¡Ã 50 years with LRA (P = 0.003), and the risk was not significantly different from that in those aged ¡Ã 50 years with HRA (P = 0.092). Additionally, the 5-year cumulative risk in those aged 45?49 years with LRA was not significantly different from that in those aged ¡Ã 50 years with LRA.

Conclusion: The postpolypectomy surveillance interval can be extended up to 5 years in patients aged 30?44 years with HRA, similar to those aged ¡Ã 50 years with LRA. However, the interval in patients aged 45?49 years with HRA and LRA should be 3 and 5 years, respectively, similar to those aged ¡Ã 50 years.
KEYWORD
Metachronous Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia, Surveillance Colonoscopy Interval, Young
FullTexts / Linksout information
  
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø